I don't think that people realize the effects of the legalization of marijuana on teenagers. Now, marijuana is even easier for teenagers to get their hands on. Obviously minors have friends or even family members that are over the age of 18, and many of the older "friends" have no problem with dealing it to the younger kids. According to The Week, "drug addiction specialists are predicting sizable increases in marijuana addiction (in CO)". I saw evidence to support this firsthand, after talking to several of my good friends who attend high school in Broomfield, Colorado. They say that pot is more prevalent then ever in their school. They told me that more and more of their friends are smoking. One of my friends even told me that one of her teachers doesn't allow the kids to eat in class anymore, because tons of kids are bringing food with pot in it to school. It would be interesting to see Colorado test scores and/or grades change within the next year. With kids going as far as consuming pot in school, I am sure that many of them will have suffering grades. Personally, I think that the cons of legalizing marijuana greatly outweigh the pros, and that the legalization of marijuana was a huge mistake. Do you think that the legalization of marijuana was a good decision? Will the US legalize marijuana as a whole in the future? How will this change our culture and morals?
"While I take inspiration from the past, like most Americans, I live for the future." -Ronald Reagan
Favorite 4th Quarter Post!
Tuesday, January 7, 2014
Dude This Whole State is High
As a born and raised Coloradan, the legalization of marijuana came as a big shock to me. This winter break was the first time that we had been back after the legalization of marijuana. We were shocked to find souvenirs like these in almost every tourist shop that we entered. I think it is sad that so many people find these souvenirs funny and cool. Personally, I believe that the legalization of marijuana has changed the entire atmosphere of the state, and it makes them look tacky, unclean and uneducated.
Monday, January 6, 2014
The Plight of an American Farmer
Over winter break this year, my family decided to take the long drive to Colorado so that we could enjoy the beautiful mountains and the way-better-than-Illinois skiing. On the drive out, between my long naps and the reading of The Crucible, we passed an interesting light display somewhere in Nebraska. Unfortunately the quality of my photo is not up to par, but I am lucky to have even got a decent picture since we were driving around 80 mph.
Merry Christmas! EAT BEEF.
This was the Christmas wish of a certain Nebraskan farmer, that Americans would eat more beef. Why? So that people will eat HIS beef, and pay him (although very little) for it. Because of the intense competition in the American food industry, farmers actually get paid rather minimally. Farmers may be some of the most hardworking people in our country, and yet they are probably paid the least amount of money. Quite honestly, I think I haven't fully appreciated the hard work that goes into making my food. We always go to the store and try to find cheap, good quality meat without giving any thought as to how it affects the farmers who produce it. The relationship between farmers and consumers couldn't be more impersonal in our culture. Often it is the consumers and grocery store co-ops that dictate the prices farmers should sell their goods for. This is the opposite of what it should be. The principle of supply and demand should allow farmers to price their own goods independently. We are a consumer based society, and therefore everything is based on the wants of the consumer rather than that of the farmer. Why should the American farmer suffer in this way? What practices could be changed that would result in a healthy supplier-consumer relationship in agriculture?
Sunday, December 1, 2013
TSA's Deep Pockets
Almost every time that we travel somewhere by plane, my dad gets his pocket knife taken away by the TSA. After seeing this happen a ridiculous amount of times, I began to wonder what the TSA does with all of the things that they take from people. After some research, I was shocked to discover the different ways that the TSA disposes of prohibited items, from shampoo to pocket knives. According to The Week, most liquids are thrown away, and all other items may either be donated or sold. Donation is a good solution and throwing stuff out is obviously not the most resourceful or economical thing to do, but I was most taken back by the fact that the government is permitted to sell the confiscated items. After reading more into the article on The Week, I discovered that, "The TSA is prohibited by law from profiting from items surrendered to them, but other government agencies' hands aren't tied the same way. Stuff that could potentially be resold is turned over to the states... and the state of Pennsylvania says it made some $800,000 in revenue from re-selling confiscated property online between 2004 and 2012." (read full article here) To me it seems very strange that just because one part of the government can't sell confiscated items, they simply hand it over to another in order to be resold. Honestly, what difference does it make? Either way, the government is taking our stuff and making an large profit on it. Fortunately, the government doesn't sell everything that they confiscate. There are some things, like scissors, that are donated to non-profit organizations or schools.
Is it okay for our government to confiscate our property and sell it for their own benefit? Is it the American people's fault for not following the rules in the first place? What are some other actions that could be taken that would be a better use of the acquired property? Should the property simply be returned to it's owner?
Saturday, November 30, 2013
Black Thanksgiving?
![]() |
Black Friday 2013 |
![]() |
Tucker Thanksgiving Dinner 2013 |
Sunday, November 24, 2013
Overcoming Obesity

According to the Harvard School of Public Health, "Over the
past three decades, childhood obesity rates have tripled in the U.S., and
today, the country has some of the highest obesity rates in the world: one out
of six children is obese,". (read complete article here) Personally, I find it hard to believe that
obesity is a disease if Americans are primarily the ones "catching
it". The American diet coupled with the lack of exercise has dramatically
changed in the last decades, and because of this I think that childhood obesity
rates have skyrocketed. Nowadays, due to both parents working or parents not
knowing how to cook, many people eat the majority of their meals at
restaurants. In addition, many Americans just don't eat very healthy.
The article also talks about the direct correlation between
wealth and weight worldwide. When there is an abundance of money and moreover
food, people tend to eat it. I do not understand how obesity could be
considered a disease if people simply don't have the discipline to stop giving
their kids so much food. I believe that we will only see an end to childhood
obesity when Americans choose to make a healthy lifestyle and diet a priority
in their homes.
Wednesday, November 20, 2013
From the Outside Looking In
Friends at school in Peru <3 |
![]() |
US Embassy (Lima, Peru) |
I think that many Americans don't realize the affect that our country has on the world. Even though we are number 1 and we should be proud of that, I think that we need to take into consideration the feelings and thoughts of other countries as well. I think it is interesting that we look at ourselves as the "good guy" while maybe in other countries we are thought of as the "try hards", "over achievers" or even the "bad guy". How do you think that our actions as a country make the rest of the world feel?
Sunday, November 17, 2013
Flaunt It!
Whether it is at a local coffee shop
or on Pandora, we as Americans are constantly surrounded by advertisements. For
some reason, just this past weekend I began to notice the abundance of ads in
my community and began to think about the reasoning behind these
advertisements.
On Friday I was at a coffee shop in
downtown Evanston with my sister. As I walked into the bathroom, I saw a
strange ad (pictured below). Pictured is a tan women in a bikini. The
advertisement reads, "If you got it, FLAUNT IT! If you don't, visit Bally
Total Fitness." In this sentence, the word flaunt really stood out to me.
The definition of flaunt is, "to display something ostentatiously,
especially in order to provoke envy or admiration or to show defiance".
The ad is telling all the women that go into the bathroom that they should
conspicuously show themselves off instead of being modest. It is also suggesting that they shouldn't be shy about it. The ad wants the women to confront the world with their looks.
For the women that don't "got it", they
can't flaunt it. Instead, according to this ad, they have to go get it. I think
that this shows a prominent American value. We try to normalize everyone, and
make everyone the same as us. Where did this coveted idea/self image sprout from?
The
American definition of beauty is also displayed by the way that we recognize and appraise
women with the perfect beach body and super tan skin. I found it interesting
that in the picture they completely cut off the woman's head. It's almost as if
the personality, intelligence and thoughts of this women don't matter one bit.
Only her looks. All of this makes me wonder how the advertisements differ in
the men's room.
What do
y'all think about the role that advertisements play in our society? How do the these things that we see every day change what we think and want for ourselves?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)